The display is a 1.5K resolution screen and supports a PPI of 450PPI. This display has many upgrades with respect to its predecessor. This display uses a CSOT C8 luminescent material. Casting a shadow over the subject at closer distances is also an issue if the light isn't coming from the ideal direction.The Xiaomi 14 comes with a 6.36-inch 2670×1200 OLED direct screen developed by Xiaomi and TCL CSOT. But the Macro serves a purpose if you can get close enough. Using the iPhone 13 Pro Macro lens on tiny insects works better with the Wide lens (1x) rather than the 77mm (3x) lens. There's really no point or need to add a clip-on Macro lens The best performer is certainly the main/default 26mm (1.0x) lens which has a slightly more capable autofocus. In essence, it's useful to have each of these lenses on the camera. But closeups are convenient, especially with the Macro lens when needed. Optical quality of that lens is appealing if there's plenty of light. Not wanting to deal with these issues, I opted to wait until the iPhone 13 Pro was released. The downside is extra bulk, the expense of the higher quality clip-on lenses and the loss of infinite focus until the device is removed. The way the clip-on lenses work is that they magnify the scene for the camera lens. My goal here was to see if it was possible to read the GIA Serial Number on the diamond, not to take a decent picture.Ģmm long black ants on a discarded sour gummy on the side of the road. My 100mm Macro lens was unable to resolve the inscription although my 28mm Macro and the iPhone 13 (shown) could. The length of the laser inscription is less than 2/3 of a millimeter long. IPhone 13 Pro (0.5 Ultra Wide Macro lens)Ī strongly cropped image from the picture above - showing the laser-etched serial number on the narrow side of a diamond. IPhone 13 Pro (0.5x Ultra Wide Macro lens)įull image (uncropped) - see crop directly below. But if used sensibly, both types of lenses can produce useful results. much like using the wide angle lens on the iPhone 13. But it requires getting within mere millimeters of the subject if using the Super Macro setting. This was their widest and was a record at the time for the smallest and least expensive Macro. In recent years we've seen the focal length drop down to 50mm in some full frame lenses although Canon released the widest with the EF-M 28mm f/3.5 IS STM lens. People are used to 100mm focal lengths when dealing with a true Macro lens. This was not close to Minimum Focus Distance. Some comparison images below, starting with what to expect from the other two lenses first.ħ7mm lens at minimum distance possible. almost to the point of the lens physically touching the subject. With this setting disabled in the menu, you can now simply select the Ultra Wide lens and move as close as you like to the subject. Since the Ultra Wide lens is also the Macro Lens, you can now (since the last Firmware update) set the iPhone 13 Pro cameras NOT to switch automatically between lenses based on what it thinks you are trying to take a picture of. The 1.0x Wide Lens, apart from having 100% focusing pixel capability can use the LIDAR module to create depth maps instantly for producing synthetic bokeh (background defocus) and in most instances the effect is amazing. The lenses are as follows:Ġ.5x - Ultra-Wide Lens - 13mm (this is also the Macro Lens).ġ.0x - Wide Lens - 26mm (this is the main lens by default).ģx - Telephoto Lens - 77mm (with Optical Image Stabilization) Each of the three lenses has their own sensor, apparently. The iPhone 13 Pro and Pro Max have the same 3-lens camera module. If it's Closeup images you need, but not specifically Macro, the other two lenses offer some compromises. which means every Macro has some physical distortion. The only downside is that this lens is also the Ultra Wide lens. I like the availability of having a Macro lens on the iPhone 13. I've tested a clip-on Macro lens with my single-lens iPhone 6S last year but decided to hold out for what ended up being the iPhone 13 Pro (Max) - as I already have dedicated Macro lenses to work with. I was checking out images on istagram and it looks like the built in Pro Macro lens has a LOT of distortion around the corners when using it very close to subjects, whereas I have seen almost no distortion in ohotos taken with the Moment Macro lens.Ĭan anyone compare the performance of these? Any insights on why there might be a difference or which one is better? Can anyone compare the performance of Moment’s 10x Macro lens (paired with a regular iPhone 13) with the iPhone 13 Pro’s built-in Macro?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |